DON'T ARGUE WITH A PATHOLOGICAL LIAR

A mistake Tonto made after releasing the videos where she narrated her version of facts was responding directly to something that her ex husband had said which didn't in fact disprove her version of facts.

You do not respond to a second offensive by your attacker after you have put up a solid defensive to their first offensive. Especially when their second offensive does nothing to disprove your defence.

I'll give you an example:

Adam accuses Mary of breaking the cup.
Mary says that she didn't and successfully proves that she didn't.
Adam, unable to refute Mary's evidence, launches an attack against Mary's character.

However, since Adam didn't prove that Mary's defence is a lie, Mary has no business replying him further. He's simply trying to distract people from the fact that he lied.

And if Mary decides to respond to Adam's lame come back, he will have succeeded in his intent.

The only time Mary might want to respond is if Adam brings up a new accusation.

E.g.: Mary did not break the cup, but Mary broke the plate.

But from experience, I'd say she should NOT. She has already proved that he's a liar. She needn't another time.

👉🏽 Churchill could have easily sued Tonto for defamation of character if indeed she had lied against him in those videos and subsequent interviews. After all, Maje sued Toke over her claim that he gave her an STD in her autobiography. The fact that he didn't, proved that her case was solid.

Experience has taught me that liars never stop at the first lie. They can spend forever coming up with a new lie every time you disprove the previous one.

How long can you play that game and who's got time for that? 🤷🏽‍♀️