Wednesday, 28 November 2012

ATTRACTION FROM SIMILARITY AND ATTRACTION FROM DIVERSITY

What triggers our attraction when we see someone? What makes us say “I like him/her” during our early encounters with someone and what makes us decide that we love that person? What eventually makes that love last or fade away?

Here is my theory.

The first element that triggers our attraction is purely sensitive. It can be what see, what we hear, what we smell and what we touch. I would say that taste is the sense that we use less the first time we meet someone. I presume we don’t go around licking or biting people to know how good they taste. But that doesn’t mean that the tongue doesn’t play a fundamental role in the game of attraction as we speak through it. If the beauty, the steps, the smell or the skin texture of someone can trigger our curiosity about someone, words determine if that attraction is going to go past that first encounter.

When we speak to someone, we want to create a friendly environment, thus choosing those topics that deal with interests we are passionate about. From that interaction we decide whether we like how that person’s view are similar to ours or we like how different they are from ours and at the same time interesting how interesting they are.

In the case of attraction from similarity two individuals come to share a lot with one another. Being that the more time we spend with someone, the more we are likely to assimilate some of their behaviours, it’s only normal to observe, in this type of relationship, the couple becoming more and more similar to one another, both in character and also in appearance (so they say). At a point they come to love in total symbiosis, depending one on the other. There is no longer a distinction between the two: he and she become a “we”. Totally inseparable and unbeatable.

On the other hand when the attraction is born from diversity, the only thing the couple has in common is their curiosity for how different one is from the other. Just like I have explained, spending a lot of time with someone, means inevitable taking on some of this person’s behaviours, so in other to maintain the main reason that brought them together, we see the pair looking for more ways to stimulate and keep the interest of one another. In this type of relationship, there is never a confusion of identities. Both are kept separate and distant. There is a he and there is a she. They are very independent from one another and that makes them very fragile as a couple.

It’s not said that one relationship is better than the other, because the individuals that compose these couples are essential in the analysis of the success or failure these relationships are destined to.

First of all, in the case of a relationship based on similarities, it’s very important for the people involved to have reached an individual maturity and self-consciousness and awareness, because as time goes on, there is the risk of a fusion of both personalities, which can result in the annulment of the individual entity. So we basically have a destruction of their original personas; as in I can no longer identify a he or a she without seeing the other party in this identification.  This is a very dangerous scenario, but unfortunately it’s not uncommon. It’s very frequent in rapports between teenagers; so people who haven’t reached the necessary maturity to maintain their respective identities in a highly influential environment. It’s also very frequent in those rapports where one party is very domineering, while the other plays a subservient role. In this case, the submissive party takes on the behaviours of the domineering one and sort of loses themselves in the process.
It’s not said that this doesn’t happen among adults though, because maturity is not always about age.
Just like in the first type of relationship, there are also negative consequences of a relationship where the attraction is based on how different the people involved are. It’s basically all about going against the natural flow: I mean people are supposed to become more similar and compatible as they spend more time together. But given that the foundation in this case is based on incompatibility, there is a strife by both parties to continuously search for new intriguing things about themselves to keep the other interested. It’s a very stressful process because it’s not easy maintaining the interest of someone who would drift away if they no longer feel that diversity from their partner. It can result in both ending up completely worn out and resentful towards another, because in other to impress their partner, they might have done something unusual or inappropriate.

Also in this case, a lot of maturity is required because a limit has to be set in matters of what we can do to keep our partner focused and interested and how the search has to be shared and balanced between the couple. It’s not unusual though to see one party striving and working hard to bring in innovations to the relationship, while the other just sits and approves or discards.

At the end of the day it’s all about balance. If a couple has so much in common, with the right maturity and mind-set, they have a high chance of having a very lasting relationship, which is meant to become stronger and stronger. On the long going, they don’t just remain lovers, but they become best-friends or even siblings; and even when the initial passion eventually fades away, they have so much to rely on, that they can still spend quality time together and remain in total harmony with another.
Also in the case where a couple doesn’t have much in common, they can still last together, if they are able to maintain a certain distance, so they don’t lose their differences. And also both parties finding new ways to make themselves look more interesting as arouse the curiosity of the other, is a key to success.

Happy loving!

No comments: